The Leading FFXIV Gil Seller - Uffxiv.com!

Sure, but that requires you to bring a warrior, bard/Machinist, ninja. It might be true that most guilds have this covered. But it shouldn't mean that a Paladin/Dark Knight with FFXIV Dragoon

UFFXIV: Tanks have zero positional requirements

Obviously, the issue is smaller than the huge overblown thing people are making it, but a lot of your points aren't really arguments.

 

For instance...

 

1. Palies only have 3 actual cooldowns, and one "ocrud" cooldown that all tanks have (sentinel vs vengeance vs shadow wall). They are very similar in effectiveness. So for palies 3 actual non tankbuster cooldowns, you can get maybe 30% uptime. The "cooldown chain" is a one time thing every 3 minutes. It is certainly far, far better than warrior for sustained AoE pack damage reduction. However, for big tank hits it is a wash. Warrior's new front parry ability is also fantastic for groups, so they got a huge buff there.

2. Again, unless you are going to die, all 3 tanking stances have the same effectiveness (defiance slightly worse because of how 20% healing =/= 20% less damage taken. Sort of mitigated by their fluctuating parry chance, but that is finicky).

 

3. Tanks have zero positional requirements, all tanks hit equally hard by disconnects...this isn't really an argument. If anything, you should argue that FoF is better, because it is, really really good. However, it isn't up enough for "burn phases" and saving it as Paladin has no actual burst is not really a thing. So FFXIV Paladin has consistent, okay dps, but on burst targets it loses miserably, and on sustained dps it is slightly lower.

 

4. Sure, but that requires you to bring a warrior, bard/Machinist, ninja. It might be true that most guilds have this covered. But it shouldn't mean that a Paladin/Dark Knight with FFXIV Dragoon, Monk, double caster or caster/ranged should be punished. Needing to be fed TP is not really an advantage. Also, I don't believe any guild right now can spare 15% bard/Machinist damage just so your tank can do a bit more dps. Nope.

 

5. Noone is calling to nerf warrior. Buff the other classes. This isn't even a valid argument.

 

Also, the screaming on the web does not seem indicative of the actual disparity. But there is a disparity. Even if numberswise this is remedied there are core mechanics problems with how the different tanks play that really impede gameplay or are hard to justify.

Related News
24
Nov

Are Moogles and Gaelikitten both connected to Azysla?

Has anyone ever thought they might be connected since they all seem to be in proximity to Azyzla and have similar looking wings? Aside from the fact Moogles have a useless (yet decent nightlight) fluffy pompom that no other creature could normally develop.

09
Oct

They are the weakest Grand Company and make the silliest decisions

Yes, defending is bad if you are just sitting on a B rank in the middle of nowhere while another Grand Company has 2-3 nodes. Yes, defending is bad when you are going to get sandwiched

16
Jun

Final Fantasy XIV: Let's talk about Hunts

Welcome to Heavensward! Here we figure out all the new things, let the research begin (but please do enjoy the game first OK?)

02
Jul

Right after the Nantes Final Fantasy XIV Heavensward press-conference

I played back when Scholar, Final Fantasy XIV summoner and warrior were considered garbage and you would get kicked from Final Fantasy XIV FCs for playing them

26
Sep

FFXIV ARR is not so much a sequel to version 1.0

Not just because it was rendered with a totally different engine to the game engine that FFXIV ARR runs under, because ARR replaces it, 1.0 has been retconned in every way

28
Dec

Naming conventions of Primals

What do you think? Was this shift deliberate, or was it mere coincidence given that most of these names were already used in past FF games

Leave A Reply

Final Fantasy XIV Top News